The paper is for the annual meeting of the Georgia Association of Historians and is titled, rather boringly, "
Marian Sims (1899-1961) was a writer born in Dalton, Georgia. In the mid-1930s, Sims, who had been a school teacher (history and French) and copy writer for an advertising firm, began writing novels and short stories. Much of her fiction dealt ("with notable honesty and intelligence," according to a reviewer in the New York Times) with the lives of middle-class southerners facing such issues as divorce and small-town religious and moral bigotry.
In 1941, Sims turned her hand to historical fiction with Beyond Surrender, a novel of Reconstruction in South Carolina. In the book's acknowledgements, she thanked Francis Butler Simkins, who was the author (with Robert Woody) of one of the first of the so-called "revisionist" histories of Reconstruction (South Carolina during Reconstruction, [1932]).
Earlier historians (and people in general) had looked at Reconstruction as a dismal failure, where vindictive northern Radical Republicans imposed horrible "reforms" on the southern states. This interpretation features scalawags and carpetbaggers, uppity and incompetent blacks, and whites being humiliated and, in general, unfairly imposed upon. William Archibald Dunning and his students (the "Dunning school") at Columbia a century ago turned out a number of studies that "proved" this interpretation. (Perhaps the most popular "history" was Claude Bowers's The Tragic Era [1929]). Think of Birth of a Nation and Gone with the Wind, and you'll understand how widespread this view was.
Historian Francis B. Simkins was no Eric Foner, but his view of Reconstruction was quite different from Dunning's. In Simkins's view, not all Yankees were bad, not all southern whites were good, and the former slaves were treated with a sympathy that even W.E.B. DuBois pronounced "fair."
A reading of the Sims-Simkins correspondence and the two books (Sims's novel and Simkins's history) shows that Sims was heavily influenced by Simkins's work, producing what might well be the first "revisionist" fiction of the Reconstruction era, a much improved version (from a historical standpoint, anyway) of Margaret Mitchell's more famous novel.
Sims has been almost completely ignored by historians, and I think that's a shame, hence the paper.
5 comments:
That sounds quite interesting. I also like how you take historical fiction seriously as historical interpretation. I always thought "Gone With the Wind," both book and movie, was an excellent example of that.
Yep, c.b., I agree. Gone with the Wind is terrible history-- and great history.
Very interesting post and paper. You mentioned that Dubois pronounced Simkins to be "fair." Is there any evidence that Simkins utiized Dubois's _Black Reconstruction_?
Hi Kevin, Thanks for reading and posting!
DuBois did a "review of the literature" in his Black Reconstruction (1935)in which he assessed Simkins's and Robert H. Woody's South Carolina during Reconstruction (1932), published three years earlier. So Simkins's work actually predates DuBois.
Simkins and Woody were co-authors of S.C. during Rec., but since Marian Sims corresponded with Simkins about her book, I used his name only for the purposes of my posting.
Howdee.
My name is Philip Kovacs and I am the Chair of a national organization working to replace NCLB with more democratic alternatives.
I am a former GA teacher, a former GA teacher teacher, and now a web activist. I post at dailykos under deweycounts, and I mismanage educatorroundtable.net, which went live today.
We are launching our national campaign in Atlanta on March 17th, and I am inviting area bloggers to the meeting, as our national organization formed with the help of the internets.
You can learn more about us here.
I hope you will read about us, agree with what we have to say, and then join us for discussion, followed by proper observation of St. Patrick's Day.
Thanks for your time and space!
Philip Kovacs
Post a Comment